Answering the Call: Qualitative Analysis of an Exceptional Therapist Seeing the Mini-Cases of “Anne,” “Mel,”and “Susan”

Product not yet rated

  • You must log in to register
    • Non-member - $25
    • NR Member - Free!
    • NR Associate - Free!
    • NR HSP Credential - Free!
    • NR Practice Academy - Free!
    • CR Associate - Free!
    • CR HSP Credential - Free!
    • International Affiliate - Free!

Abstract

While some therapists are consistently more effective than others (Heinonen & Nissen-Lie, 2020), there is very little investigationon the in-session processes of these highly effective therapists. One exception is the qualitative and quantitative study of 10 cases of the documented “supershrink” Erigoni (“Eri”) Vlass (Hansen, Lambert, & Vlass, 2015a), so defined on the basis of exceptional outcome data from Lambertet al.’s (1996) Outcome Questionnaire-45 (https://www.oqmeasures.com/oq-45-2/). The present project builds on the Hansen et al. study by providing detailed qualitative analysis, using Glaser & Strauss’s (2017) “grounded theory” approach of the transcripts of three new, separate, therapy “mini-cases” seen by Eri, as an added resource to ongoing therapy with one of the authors (T.R.). The cases included “Anne”and “Mel,” each seen for twosessions, and “Susan,”seen for one session. The qualitative analysis explored supershrink Eri’s clinical way of being and in-session approachas she carriedout therapeutic actions that allowed for an optimized approach that is both unique to herself and adaptable to each client. The results yielded two core categories: “(1)Keeping a natural, fluid rhythm during the session while balancing directive exploration, frequent associations, and interpretations with a sense of support, empathy and understanding;”and “(2) Fostering a sense of agency, mutual collaboration and positive expectation while co-constructing a credible narrative to be used in hypnosis.” Further, the analysis yielded three sub-categories for category 1, and four subcategories for category 2.  

Keywords: master therapists; therapeutic expertise; superior outcomes; “supershrink”; qualitative, grounded theory analysis; case study; clinical case study

Continuing Education Information

2 CE Credits, Instructional Level: Intermediate

2 Contact Hours (New York Board of Psychology)

Learning Objectives:

  1. Describe the grounded theory method.
  2. Apply techniques that will help improve your effectiveness as a therapist.

----------------------------

CE Disclaimers

The National Register of Health Service Psychologists is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. The National Register maintains responsibility for this program and its content.

The National Register of Health Service Psychologists is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0010

Components visible upon registration.