The Essence and Essential Values of Our Democracy: An Extraordinary Term for the Supreme Court
-
You must log in to register
- Non-member - $25
- NR Member - Free!
- NR Associate - Free!
- NR HSP Credential - Free!
- NR Practice Academy - Free!
- CR Associate - Free!
- CR HSP Credential - Free!
- International Affiliate - Free!
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024–2025 Term was remarkable. It was an unusual “Tale of Two Terms.” The regular Term, starting in October 2024, proceeded as expected, with extensive briefing, oral arguments, and full opinions. For mental health professionals, several cases stood out: the Court upheld state laws restricting gender-transition care for minors, recognized parents’ rights to exclude their children from certain LGBTQ+ classroom materials, and ruled on cases involving disabilities, the death penalty, gun rights, and pornography. The American Psychological Association (APA) filed amicus briefs in the gender-transition and LGBTQ+ instruction cases. Meanwhile, a Second (“Shadow”) Term was dominated by a flood of emergency requests, many of them tied to Trump administration policies. These disputes, including issues related to federal grants, immigration, and executive power, were often decided without complete briefing or oral arguments. The Court generally did not provide full written opinions, leaving some ambiguities about the decisions. This article analyzes both Terms, examines public trust in the Court, and previews a consequential year ahead, with cases involving conversion therapy, transgender athletes, and pregnancy center regulations.
Continuing Education Information
1 CE Credit, Instructional Level: Intermediate
1 Contact Hour (New York Board of Psychology)
Disclosures: Author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Generative AI was not used for the development or content of this presentation.
Learning Objectives:
1. Analyze key U.S. Supreme Court decisions from the 2024–2025 Term relevant to mental health professionals.
2. Distinguish between the Court’s regular Term and “shadow docket” decisions and their implications.
3. Evaluate how recent and upcoming Court cases may affect mental health practice and public trust in the Court.
----------------------------
CE Disclaimers
The National Register of Health Service Psychologists is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. The National Register maintains responsibility for this program and its content.
The National Register of Health Service Psychologists is recognized by the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Psychology as an approved provider of continuing education for licensed psychologists #PSY-0010
Smith
Steven R. Smith
California Western School of Law
You have not yet registered for this course. Register today and access this course any time under "My Courses/Registrations"
